Prediction: Chicago Cubs VS St. Louis Cardinals 2025-06-26

Witty and Tongue-in-Cheek Analysis: Cubs vs. Cardinals – A Rivalry That’s More “I’ll Have the Chili” Than “I’ll Have the Chili”

The Cubs and Cardinals are set for a Game 3 showdown that’s less “Let’s play baseball” and more “Let’s settle this over a lukewarm plate of stadium hot dogs.” The Cubs, reeling from a three-game skid, are desperate to avoid a series sweep by their arch-rivals. Meanwhile, the Cardinals, riding an 8-2 tear, are smelling NL Central dominance like a concession stand smells nacho cheese.

Key Players & Stats:
- Matthew Boyd (Cubs): 6-3, 2.84 ERA. A pitcher with the ERA of a man who’s never seen a fastball over 90 mph.
- Erick Fedde (Cardinals): 3-6, 3.54 ERA. A pitcher with the consistency of a Wi-Fi signal in a subway tunnel.
- Cubs’ Record: 46-33 (NL Central leaders).
- Cardinals’ Record: 38-41 (2.5 games back).

Odds Breakdown:
- Moneyline: Cubs -170, Cardinals +220.
- Spread: Cubs -1.5 (-110), Cardinals +1.5 (-110).
- Total: 9 runs (Even money on Over/Under).

Injuries/Updates: None reported. Both teams’ lineups are as healthy as a stadium vendor’s cholesterol.

Data-Driven Best Bet:
Let’s crunch the numbers like a fanboy at a stats convention.

1. Implied Probabilities from Odds:
- Cubs: 1 / (1 + (1/1.7)) ≈ 58.8%
- Cardinals: 1 / (1 + (1/2.2)) ≈ 45.5%
- Adjusted for vig: Cubs ≈ 56.4%, Cardinals ≈ 43.6%.

2. Underdog Win Rate (MLB): 41%.
- Cardinals are the underdog here. Their implied win rate (43.6%) is 2.6% over their historical 41% average. That’s a red flag for value.
- Cubs’ implied win rate (56.4%) vs. their true probability (let’s say 55-58% based on records and Boyd’s form) is a slight edge.

3. Expected Value (EV) Calculation:
- Cubs Moneyline:
EV = (0.564 * 1.7) - 1 = -0.04 (Slight negative due to vig).
- Cardinals Moneyline:
EV = (0.436 * 2.2) - 1 = -0.04 (Also negative).
- Cubs Spread (-1.5):
Implied probability to cover ≈ 56.4%. Historical cover rate for favorites with 1.5-run lines is ~58%. Slight edge here.

4. Split the Difference:
- Cubs’ implied win rate (56.4%) vs. historical underdog rate (41%) = 15.4% gap.
- Cardinals’ implied (43.6%) vs. 41% = 2.6% gap.
- Best EV? The Cubs’ spread (-1.5) offers the tightest line and aligns with Boyd’s sub-3.00 ERA (Cubs’ starters have held opponents to 3.2 runs/game this season).

Final Verdict:
Take the Cubs -1.5 (-110).
Why? Boyd’s ERA (2.84) vs. Fedde’s (3.54) gives the Cubs a statistical edge. The Cardinals’ recent offensive surge (scoring 5.2 runs/game in their last 10) might not be enough to overcome a 1.5-run deficit. Plus, the Cubs’ lineup (4th in MLB in OPS) should provide enough support for Boyd to secure the cover.

Bonus Prop Bet: Over 9 Runs.
- The Cardinals’ offense has averaged 5.2 runs in their last 10 games. Fedde’s 3.54 ERA suggests he’ll allow 4+ runs. The Cubs’ offense isn’t exactly a pitcher’s nightmare (3.9 runs/game), but with Boyd’s 2.84 ERA, the Over 9 (-110) is a toss-up. However, the Cardinals’ recent power surge (1.5 HRs/game) makes the Over a safer play.

TL;DR: Cubs -1.5 for the cover, Over 9 for the chaos. The rivalry is as spicy as a ballpark pepperoni pizza, and the Cubs are the slight favorite to avoid a sweep.

Created: June 26, 2025, 9:17 a.m. GMT