Prediction: UMass Lowell River Hawks VS Stonehill Skyhawks 2025-11-26

Stonehill Skyhawks vs. UMass-Lowell River Hawks: A Tale of Two (Unimpressive) Teams

The Stonehill Skyhawks (2-5) and UMass-Lowell River Hawks (1-6) are about to collide in a Northeast-10 Conference clash that reads like a Netflix script for a documentary titled “Why Is This Game Happening?” But let’s parse the stats, news, and odds to find the silver lining—or at least the less rusty one.

Odds & Implied Probabilities: A Math Class We Didn’t Ask For
Stonehill is favored by 2.5-3.5 points across bookmakers, with decimal moneyline odds hovering around 1.65-1.70 (implying a 57-61% chance to win). UMass-Lowell’s odds of 2.20-2.28 (implied 43-45%) suggest they’re the underdog, which is less shocking than a toddler napping through a fire drill. The total points line sits at 147.5-148.5, with slightly better value on the Under (odds: 1.87-1.95). Given both teams’ anemic scoring—Stonehill averages 69.4 PPG (318th nationally), UMass-Lowell 73.0 (275th)—betting on a high-scoring thriller is like expecting a sloth to pole-vault.

Team News: Injuries, Efficiency, and the Art of Losing
Stonehill: Fresh off a 74-70 home win over Lafayette, where Davante Hackett dropped 23 points, the Skyhawks are 2-0 at home. They’re third in the NEC with 14.1 assists per game, led by Rex Sunderland (3.6 APG). But their 44.0% field goal percentage is a leaky faucet compared to UMass-Lowell’s porous defense (allowing 47.3%). Key man to watch: Hermann Koffi, who’s nailing 42.1% from deep (3.4 threes per game). Think of him as a human Wi-Fi signal—occasionally spotty, but better than nothing.

UMass-Lowell: The River Hawks are 0-5 on the road, and their defense is a sieve. They allow 84.0 PPG (335th nationally) and get outscored by 11.0 PPG. Their three-point shooting? A惨淡 31.9% (242nd), making them the basketball equivalent of a blindfolded archer at a balloon toss. Austin Green (13.7 PPG) and JJ Massaquoi (15.4 PPG) are their lone bright spots, but Green’s zero assists in his last game suggest he’s more scorer than playmaker—like a chef who only knows how to use the microwave.

The Absurd Analogy Hour
- Stonehill’s offense: Imagine a toaster that finally learns to pop up. It’s not elegant, but it gets the job done. Hackett’s 23-point performance was like the toaster finally crisping bread after years of burning Pop-Tarts.
- UMass-Lowell’s defense: If their defense were a weather forecast, it’d always say “Scattered thunderstorms and a 100% chance of regret.” They’ve allowed 9.3 three-pointers per game—enough to make a Starbucks barista blush.
- The spread (-2.5 to -3.0): Picking Stonehill is like betting your neighbor will finally finish their Sudoku puzzle. It’s not thrilling, but the odds are in your favor.

Prediction: A Game for the Ages (Probably Not)
Stonehill’s home-court advantage, superior assist-to-turnover ratio, and UMass-Lowell’s road woes paint a lopsided picture. While the Skyhawks’ -2.5 spread isn’t insurmountable, UMass-Lowell’s defensive incompetence (allowing 84 PPG) and Stonehill’s ability to avoid turnovers (14.1 assists) tilt the scale.

Final Verdict: Bet on Stonehill (-2.5) to win 68-60, unless Davante Hackett decides to moonwalk into the stands mid-game. The Under 148.5 is also a safe bet—this isn’t a game; it’s a math problem where the answer is “everyone needs better stats.”

Disclaimer: This analysis is not financial advice. If you bet on UMass-Lowell, may your hope be eternal and your bankroll… less so.

Created: Nov. 26, 2025, 3:18 p.m. GMT

Pikkit - Sports Betting Tracker, Odds, Insights & Analysis.